Hi tech, high threat: it’s time to plan for the downsides to technology | Michael Boskin

When authorities focus too much on narrow feuds like the FBI v Apple, it creates opening for sudden hazards such as cyber-attacks

What do the leaks of unflattering email from the Democratic National Committees hacked servers during the 2016 US presidential election campaign and the deafen hour-long emergency warning sirens in Dallas, Texas, have in common? Its the same occasion that associates the Northern korean nuclear threat and terrorist attacks in Europe and the US: all represent the down sides of tremendously beneficial engineerings gamble that increasingly expect a robust program response.

The developing contentiousness to new technologies is epitomized in debates over so-called net impartiality and disputes between Apple and the FBI over unlocking suspected gunmen iPhones. This is hardly surprising: as engineering are growing increasingly consequential feigning everything from our security( nuclear weapons and cyberwar) to our positions( labour market interruptions from advanced software and robotics) its impact has been good, bad, and potentially ugly.

First, the very best. Technology has killed infections such as smallpox and has all but eradicated others, such as polio; enabled cavity journey; sped up transportation; and opened brand-new vistas of opportunity for commerce, recreation, and often else. Cellular telephony alone has freed the vast majority of the worlds population from communication constraints.

Technical advances have also increased economic productivity. The invention of crop rotation and mechanised equipment dramatically increased agricultural productivity and allowed human civilisation to shifting from farms to cities. As lately as 1900, one-third of Americans lived on farms; today, the above figures is exactly 2 %.

Similarly, electrification, automation, software, and, very recently, robotics have all produced major amplifications in manufacturing productivity. My colleague Larry Lau and I estimate that technological change is responsible for approximately half the economic rise of the G7 economies in recent decades.

Pessimists was concern that the productivity-enhancing benefits of technology are waning and unlikely to rebound. They claim that technologies such as internet research and social networking cannot increase productivity to the same extent that electrification and the rise of the car did.

Optimists, by differentiate, believe that advances such as large-scale data, nanotechnology and neural networks herald a brand-new age of technology-driven progress. While it is not feasible to prophesy the next killer app arising under these technologies, that is no reason, they reason, to presume there isnt one. After all, important technologies sometimes receive their central commercial price from exploits quite different from those the inventor had in mind.

For example, James Watts steam engine was created to pump water out of coal quarries , not to ability railways or ships. Likewise, Guglielmo Marconis work on long-distance radio dissemination was proposed simply to create tournament for the telegraph; Marconi never envisioned broadcast radio stations or modern wireless communication.

But technological change has also stimulation considerable dislocation, harming many along the way. In the early 19 th century, suspicion of such dislocation drove textile employees in Yorkshire and Lancashire the Luddites to smash brand-new machines such as automated looms and knitting frames.

The dislocation of craftsmen continues today, with robotics dislocating some manufacturing jobs in the economically more advanced economies. Numerous were afraid that artificial intelligence will bring farther disorganization, though developments in the situation may not be as dire as some expect. In the 1960 s and early 1970 s, many believed that computers and automation would lead to widespread structural unemployment. That never happened, because new kinds of jobs risen to offset what disorganization occurred.

In any case, occupation displacement is not the only negative side effect of new technology. The auto has greatly advanced mobility, but at the price of undesirable air pollution. Cable Tv, the internet, and social media have given parties extraordinary capability over the information they share and receive; but they have also contributed to the balkanisation of information and social interaction, with people preferring beginnings and networks that reinforce their own biases.

Modern information technology, moreover, tend to be dominated by exactly a few houses: Google, for example, is literally synonymous with internet investigation. Historically, such a concentration of financial dominance has been met with pushback, rooted in dreads of monopoly. And, certainly, such firms are beginning to face scrutiny from antitrust officials, particularly in Europe. Whether buyers generally tolerant attitudes toward these companies will be sufficient to offset historic relates over size and insult of marketplace supremacy remains to be seen.

But the downsides of technology have become far darker, with the foes of a free civilization able to communicate, program, and conduct damaging numbers more easily. Islamic State and al-Qaida recruit online and ply virtual counseling on wreaking carnage; often, such groups do not even have to communicate immediately with someones to stimulate them to perpetrate a terrorist attack. And, of course, nuclear power plants adds is not simply emissions-free electricity, but also massively destructive weapons.

All of these threats and upshots demand clear policy responses that seem not just to the past and present, but likewise to the future. Too often, governments become entangled in restricted and immediate contraventions, such as that between the FBI and Apple, and lose sight of future threats and challenges. That can create opening for something really ugly to occur, such as, remark, a cyber-attack that knocks out an electric grid. Beyond the immediate ramifications, such an incident could stimulate the general public to demand excessively stringent kerbs on technology, gambling freedom and prosperity in the quest for security.

What is certainly requirement are brand-new and improved institutions, policies and cooperation between enforcement and private firms, as well as among authorities. Such endeavors must not just react to developments, but too apprehend them. Only then can we mitigate future risks, while continuing to tap new technologies potential to improve people lives.

Michael J Boskin is prof of financials at Stanford University and senior chap at the Hoover Institution

Project Syndicate

Bill Nye: Science made America great

( CNN) I was proud to join thousands of pertained citizens, scientists and designers in Saturday’s March for Science. With more than 600 marches taking place around the world, we imparted that science is political , not partisan, and discipline should determine our policies.

Although it is the makes by which humankind detects objective trues in nature, science is and had all along been political. Article I, Section 8 of the US Constitution refers to promoting “the progress of science and useful arts” to motivate trailblazers, stimulate economics and build only laws.

The US has already become the most powerful nation on Earth and among the greatest in record, because it has long respected and promoted science. Countless plans, from military deployments to regulations that control the formula of a shampoo, are based on science.

Protesters to Trump: Science matters

REPORT: Under Pressure, Western Tech Firms Share Cyber Secrets With Russia

By Joel Schectman, Dustin Volz and Jack Stubbs

Western technology firms, including Cisco, IBM and SAP, are acceding to necessitates by Moscow for access to closely guarded commodity security secrets, at a time when Russia has been accused of growing numbers of cyber attempts on the West, a Reuters investigation has found.

Russian authorities are requesting Western tech companies to allow them to review informant code for the safety concoctions such as firewalls, anti-virus applications and software containing encryption before countenancing the products to be imported and sold in the country. The solicits, which has grown since 2014, are ostensibly done to ensure foreign agent business have not hidden any “backdoors” that would allow them to burrow into Russian systems.

But those inspections too supply the Russians an opportunity to find vulnerabilities in the products’ informant system – rules that control the basic runnings of computer equipment – current and former U.S. officials and security experts said.

While a number of U.S. firms say they are playing ball to preserve their entree to Russia’s huge tech market, at least one U.S. firm, Symantec, told Reuters it has stopped cooperating with different sources code re-examine over security concerns. That halt has not been previously reported.

Symantec said one of the labs inspecting its products was not independent enough from the Russian government.

U.S. officials say they have warned firms about the risks of granting the Russians to review their makes’ root code, because of horrors it could be used in cyber onrushes. But they say they have no legal authority to stop the practice unless information and communication technologies has inhibited armed applications or violates U.S. sanctions.

From their surface, business say they are under pressure to acquiesce to the demands from Russian regulators or risk being shut out of a lucrative market. The companionships say they only tolerate Russia to review their source code in secure facilities that avoid code from being replica or varied.( Graphic on root code refresh process: tmsnrt.rs/ 2sZudWT)

The necessitates are being make use of Russia’s Federal Security Service( FSB ), which the U.S. authority says took part in the cyber attacks on Hillary Clinton’s 2016 presidential expedition and the 2014 hacker of 500 million Yahoo email histories. The FSB, which has repudiated participation in both such elections and Yahoo hackers, doubleds as a regulator charged with approving the sale of sophisticated engineering produces in Russia.

The examines are also conducted by the Federal Service for Technical and Export Control( FSTEC ), a Russian justification agency tasked with countering cyber espionage and protecting country secrets. Enters published by FSTEC and reviewed by Reuters show that from 1996 to 2013, it conducted source code re-examines as part of approvals for 13 engineering products from Western companionships. In the past three years alone it carried out 28 reviews.

A Kremlin spokesman denoted all questions to the FSB. The FSB did not respond to requests for comment. FSTEC said in a statement that its reviews were in line with international rehearsal. The U.S. State Department declined to comment.

Moscow’s source code entreaties have mushroomed in scope since U.S.-Russia relations went into a tailspin in accordance with the Russian annexation of Crimea in 2014, according to eight current and former U.S. officials, four companionship administrations, three U.S. transaction the lawyers and Russian regulatory documents.

In addition to IBM, Cisco and Germany’s SAP, Hewlett Packard Enterprise Co and McAfee have also tolerated Russia to conduct source code reviews of their products, according to parties familiar with the companies’ interactions with Moscow and Russian regulatory records.

Until now, little has been known about that regulatory critique process outside of the industry. The FSTEC documents and interviews with those involved in the reviews support a uncommon space into the tense push-and-pull between technology companies and governments in an era of organizing horrify about hacking.

Roszel Thomsen, a lawyer who helps U.S. tech companionships steer Russia import statutes, said here firms must equilibrium the dangers of revealing root system to Russian security services against possible lost sales.

” Some companies do refuse ,” he added.” Others look at the health risks grocery and take the risk .”


If tech houses do reject the FSB’s source code petitions, then approving for their makes can be indefinitely retarded or disavowed outright, U.S. craft the lawyers and U.S. officials supposed. The Russian information technology grocery is expected to be worth $18.4 billion this year, according to market researcher International Data Corporation( IDC ).

Six current and former U.S. officials who have is dealing with fellowships on the issue said they are suspicious about Russia’s reasons for the expanded reviews.

” It’s something we have a real expressed concerns about ,” said a former senior Commerce Department official who had direct knowledge of the interaction between U.S. companies and Russian officials until he left office this year.” You have to ask yourself what it is they are trying to do, and clearly they are trying to look for intelligence they can use to their advantage to exploit, and that’s obviously a real problem .”

However , nothing of the officials who spoke to Reuters could point to specific a few examples of hackers or cyber espionage that were manufactured possible by the review process.

Source code entreaties are not unique to Russia. In the United States, tech firms allow the government to audit generator code in limited instances as part of defense contracts and other feelings government work. China sometimes also requires generator code refreshes as a condition to import commercial-grade application, U.S. commerce attorneys say.


The reviews often takes residence in self-assured facilities known as” clean rooms .” Several of the Russian fellowships that conduct the testing for Western tech companies on behalf of Russian regulators have current or previous links to the Russian military, according to their websites.

Echelon, a Moscow-based engineering measuring companionship, is one of several independent FSB-accredited measuring hubs that Western companies can hire to assistance acquire FSB approval for their products.

Echelon CEO Alexey Markov told Reuters his operators review source system in special laboratories, controlled by the companies, where no software data can be altered or conveyed.

Markov responded Echelon is a private and independent firm but does have a business relationship with Russia’s military and law enforcement authorities.

Echelon’s website touts medals it was awarded in 2013 by Russia’s Ministry of Defense for” protection of state secrets .” The company’s website too sometimes used to refer to Markov as the” Head of Attestation Center of the Ministry of Defense .”

In an email, Markov said that title is exclusively intended to convey Echelon’s role as a certified outside tester of armed technology testing. The medallions were generic and unimportant, he said.

But for Symantec, the lab” didn’t meet our forbid” for sovereignty, remarked spokeswoman Kristen Batch.

” In the case of Russia, we chose the protection provided for in our patron base through the deployment of uncompromised defence makes was more important than prosecuting an increase in market share in Russia ,” enunciated Batch, who added that the company did not feel Russia had tried to hack into its products.

” It poses a risk to the unity of our produces that we are not ready to accept ,” she said.

Without the source code approval, Symantec can no longer get approval to sell some of its business-oriented insurance makes in Russia.” As a arise, we do negligible business there ,” she said.

Markov declined to comment on Symantec’s decision, citing a non-disclosure arrangements with the company.


Over the past year, HP has applied Echelon to allow FSTEC to review source code, according to the agency’s enters. A fellowship spokesman declined to comment.

An IBM spokesman demonstrated the company allows Russia to review its informant code in lock, company-controlled facilities” where strict procedures are followed .”

FSTEC certification records evidenced the Information Security Center, an independent experimenting company based outside Moscow, has re-examine IBM’s source code on behalf of the agency. The corporation was founded more than 20 years ago under the auspices of an institute within Russia’s Ministry of Defense, according to its website. The firm did not respond to requests for comment.

In a statement, McAfee said the Russia code inspects were conducted at” certified testing labs” at company-owned propositions in the United States.

SAP allows Russia to review and test source system in a self-assured SAP facility in Germany, according to person or persons very well known the process. In a company statement, SAP said the review process ensure Russian clients” their SAP software investments are safe and secure .”

Cisco has recently tolerated Russia to review source code, according to person or persons familiar with the matter.

A Cisco spokeswoman declined to comment on the company’s interactions with Russian permissions but said the house does sometimes allow regulators to scrutinize small parts of its system in “trusted” independent labs and that the reviews do not settlement the security of its products.

Before letting its consideration of the report, Cisco scrutinizes the code to ensure they are not disclosing vulnerabilities that could be used to hack the products, she said.

( Reporting by Joel Schectman and Dustin Volz in Washington and Jack Stubbs in Moscow; Editing by Jonathan Weber and Ross Colvin)

Read more: http :// www.huffingtonpost.com/ entry/ russia-tech-cyber-secrets_us_5 94 da451e4b02734df2a83a2

Russia blocked Google briefly, but no, Google and Russia are not fighting

Image: AP/ REX/ Shutterstock

Russian governments blocked Google for about 3 hour on Thursday.

And while this may seem like a familiar story another speciman of an authoritarian government blocking major internet sites this brief Google blockage may have been a true-life blip, according to The Moscow Times

Roskomnadzor, an internet regulator that controls the flow of mass communication and information technology in Russia, apparently blocked Google because the search engine still offered users a link to a bookmaker currently under a law battle with the Russian government. Google deleted the pertaining association, and Russians could again access the site.

The dispute is reportedly the result of a technicality, rather than an actual fighting against Google. But the Russian government has pushed with the search engine before.

Google agreed to pay the equivalent of $7.8 million earlier this year to settle a lawsuit in which the search busines agreed to allow apps from rival companies to be pre-installed on the home screen of phones constructed with Google’s Android software. The agreement reached about after a Google competitor in Russia, Yandex, deplored that investing Google apps on Android telephones yielded Google an unjust advantage. Google is required to make sure its browser, Chrome, allows users to change to the Yandex search engine.

Read more:

Big Names Descend on White House for Trumps Technology Summit

President Donald Trump promised” embroiling changeover” in the federal government’s use of technology as he accepted top executives from many of the world’s largest tech companies to the White House.

The meeting Monday accompanied leaders of an industry whose key people have at times openly clashed with Trump. But nothing of the executives criticized the president in public discussions, and Trump projected a jovial feeling, touting the additions in technology broths since he took office and conveying confidence his government would overcome such long-running challenges as revamping the air traffic system.

He likewise offered a little bit of succour for tech administrations because of concerns his immigration policies would disavow service industries talent, saying he was working” extremely diligently” with Congress on immigration so” you can get the people you want .”

Apple Chief Executive Officer Tim Cook, who has chided Trump for his excursion forbidding and the U.S. pullout from the Paris climate treaty, responded with kudo for Trump’s senior consultant and son-in-law, Jared Kushner, who is leading the administration’s technology sphere outreach.

” The U.S. should have the most modern government in “the worlds” and today it doesn’t .,” Cook alleged.” It’s great to see the effort that Jared is putting in in working on occasions that will pay back in five and 10 and 20 times .”

The meeting Monday of the American Technology Council, which Trump commissioned in May and which is being shepherded by Kushner, knocks off a week of disposal events themed on technology.

The agenda featured labor hearings on issues including cybersecurity, big data, impostor observation, artificial intelligence and gloom computing, according to a White House document outlining the program.

Big Names

A who’s-who of technology refers were in attendance, including Microsoft Corp. CEO Satya Nadella, Amazon.com Inc. CEO Jeff Bezos, Oracle Co-CEO Safra Catz, Alphabet Inc. Executive Chairman Eric Schmidt and International Business Machines Corp. CEO Ginni Rometty.

Trump’s May 1 executive ordering generating the American Technology Council called for the group of federal officials to modernise the use of technology across the government.

” Americans deserve better digital assistances from their government ,” Trump wrote in the order.

The federal government spends more than $80 billion yearly on information technology, hiring about 113,000 IT professionals, in agreement with the White House. But many of the information systems used by federal agencies are outdated and ineffective, according to two senior administration officials who briefed reporters about the meet on condition of anonymity.

Best Practices

A recent decision by Veterans Affairs Secretary David Shulkin to contract with a private busines to manage the department’s electronic medical records is an example of the kind of changes the American Technology Council will seek, government officials said.

Much of the agenda for Monday’s meeting involves seeking ways for the Trump administration to adopt excellent practises from the private sector organizations, including spotting opportunities to draft talented individuals to join the government.

The officials too planned to discuss the H-1B visa program, which Trump has pledged to scale back despite the objections from Silicon Valley.

The meeting was also conspicuous for who didn’t accompany. Tesla CEO Elon Musk left two of Trump’s advisory councils earlier this month after the president was indicated that he would gather the U.S. out of the Paris climate agreement.

For more on Silicon Valley’s relationship with the Trump administration, check out the podcast 😛 TAGEND

Additionally, Trump hasn’t replenished various top technology positions within the federal government, including the rights of premier engineering patrolman and administrator of the Office of Science and Technology Policy. Both officials are listed as members of the American Technology Council.

Trump’s efforts to reach out to Silicon Valley followed by former President Barack Obama, who convened regularly with technology senior executives and propelled the U.S. Digital Service in an effort to recruit private-sector flair and modernise government.

CenturyLink Faces Class-Action Lawsuit Seeking Up to $12 Billion

CenturyLink Inc ., sued last week by a former hire for allegedly leading a sales incentive programme and firing her for drawing attention to it, is now the subject of a class-action complaint trying impairs as high as $12 billion.

The complaint, which comes as the Monroe, La ., telecommunications company is in the midst of a $ 34 billion consolidation with Level 3 Communications Inc ., seeks to establish a class of consumers harmed by an alleged high-pressure auctions culture. Last week’s self-proclaimed whistleblower, Heidi Heiser, supposes such a culture left patrons paying millions of dollars for details they didn’t request.

The new lawsuit, filed in the center territory of California late Sunday night, quotes Heiser’s suit, as well as same accusations posted on social media and purchaser revaluation websites by parties linking themselves as CenturyLink clients, and accuses CenturyLink of forgery, unfair competition, and unjust enrichment.

“Ms. Heiser’s allegations of what she celebrated, and what CenturyLink corporate culture fostered, comply with its own experience of hundreds of thousands and potentially millions of consumers who have been victimized by CenturyLink, ” the complaint districts. “It is estimated that the damages to shoppers could array between $600 million and $12 billion, based on CenturyLink’s 5.9 million subscribers.”

” The happening that a principle firm is trying to leverage a wrongful end dres into a putative class action suit does not change our original location ,” Mark Molzen, a CenturyLink spokeman, said in a statement, adding that Heiser failed to report her charges to the company’s 24 -hour Integrity Line. He said her claims” are altogether incompatible” with company policy and culture and that” we take these allegations gravely and are diligently investigating this matter .”

Class actions are common after contentious allegations against large-scale firms. Sunday’s lawsuit was brought on behalf of the consumers by the Geragos& Geragos law firm, led by luminary lawyer Mark J. Geragos. Heiser didn’t report her concerns to the Federal Communications Commission or other authorities.

The referred plaintiffs in the case provided for are Craig McLeod and Steven L. McCauley, both current clients of CenturyLink. During a exchange in early April with a sales agent on CenutryLink’s website, McLeod, 65, was offered a faster internet connect for an extra$ 2 a month with a two-year contract, and consented, according to the complaint. He alleges he incurred considerably greater costs than quoted and was billed for a reparation that never was formed.

In an interview, McLeod, a semi-retired truck driver, said that in the field of Alabama where he lives, CenturyLink is no other hardwired internet provider available.

“I’m pretty much persisted with CenturyLink, ” he articulated. “I am seriously considering moving exactly because of them. The internet is that important to me.”

On Friday, CenturyLink’s shares fell the most in six weeks on the word of Heiser’s suit, while the shares of uniting spouse Level 3 also dropped crisply. The consolidation will put CenturyLink up against powerhouses such as AT& T Inc. in auction to provision communications services to business. CenturyLink, which provides data services nationwide, including hosting, cloud, and information technology services, booked $816 million in net income on $17.5 billion in marketings last year.

Heiser’s complaint was of the view that Heiser became increasingly concerned about what she mentioned at CenturyLink after report of Wells Fargo& Co.’s regulatory disturbances violated in September. In all such cases, Wells Fargo hires, to give incentives and gratify marketings destinations, opened deposit and credit card chronicles without purchasers’ consent. Without declaring misbehavior, Wells Fargo culminated up shooting more than 5,000 the workers and agreeing to pay $185 million in fines, in addition to providing compensating clients for fees related to the unauthorized accounts.

Trump tells tech CEOs that Washington needs to ‘catch up with the revolution’

At a had met with top tech presidents Trump predicted a transformation of outdated federal engineering, which astonishingly still includes floppy disks

Donald Trump called for sweeping changeover of all federal departments engineering during the first convene of the American Technology Council, established by executive prescribe last month.

Eighteen of Americas resulting engineering executives including Amazon CEO Jeff Bezos, Apple CEO Tim Cook, Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella and Eric Schmidt, the executive chair of Google parent Alphabet convened at the White House Monday for the summit.

Government needs to catch up with the technology revolution, answered Trump. America should be the world leader in authority engineering just as we are in every other perspective, and we are going to start our big-hearted perimeter again in engineering such its significant industry.

The tech governors spent four hours gratifying officials including vice-president Mike Pence, treasury secretary Steven Mnuchin and commerce secretary Wilbur Ross before meeting with the president. Ivanka Trump, the presidents daughter, was also present.

They discussed renewing the governments technological infrastructure, cutting fraud and government costs and improving services for taxpayers. The White House feels these measures could save up to$ 1tn over 10 years.

Together we will loose the productivity of the private sector to provide citizen services in a way that has never happened before, remarked White House elderly adviser and Trumps son-in-law Jared Kushner, before its present session started.

Kushner foreground some startling a few examples of outdated federal IT infrastructure, including the fact that the defense department still utilizes 8-inch floppy disks on some of its gift organisations. He also mentioned that civilian agencies preserve more than 1.6 m email addresses per month expending on-premise servers at an average costs of $20 -per-user per month. Switching to cloud-based email services could reduce these costs down to$ 3-per-user per month, he said.

Our goal here is simple: we are here to improve the day to daytime lives of the ordinary citizen. Thats a core hope and “were about” saving it, added Kushner.

We will foster a brand-new placed of is the beginning focused on gov-tech and be a global leader in the field acquiring authority most transparent and responsive to citizens needs.

Ivanka Trump sits beside Ginni Rometty, CEO of IBM, at the roundtable in the government breakfast nook of the White House. Picture: Alex Brandon/ AP

The tech CEOs were also pushing their own schedules, according to Recode . Amazon CEO Jeff Bezos, for example, called on the government to are benefiting from the type of commercial-grade engineering that Amazon sells. Palantir CEO Alex Karp said that large-hearted data analysis, the kind Palantir offers, could help stop fraudulent federal spend. Apples Tim Cook required coding to be made a requirement in schools.

This was the first meet of the American Technology Council since the president announced its creation in an executive tell signed on 11 May.

Within the order, which builds on proposes laid out by the Obama administration, Trump announced the creation of the council, whose mission is to coordinate the eyesight programme and direction for all federal departments use of information technology and the delivery of services through information technology.

The council was given 90 daylights to come up with a project designed to change antiquated, fragmented plans across the administration has either one or more consolidated system buildings or shared IT business, including email, gloom and cybersecurity services.

Other members of the council include: Ajay Banga, the CEO of Mastercard; Safra Catz, co-CEO of Oracle; Alex Karp, CEO of Palantir; Brian Krzanich, CEO of Intel; Ginni Rometty, CEO of IBM; and Peter Thiel.

The council was presided over by Chris Liddell, a top aide-de-camp to Trump and the former leader financial officer of Microsoft.

Notably absent from the see was Facebook neither Mark Zuckerberg nor Sheryl Sandberg were able to attend due to scheduling conflicts. It was the only one out of the top-five most valuable business in the US to not have a representative at the meeting.

The meeting arrives at a time when a number of people in the tech world had been decided to interval themselves from Trump after he withdrew from the Paris climate accord. Elon Musk, founder and CEO of Tesla and Space X, announced here Twitter: Am differing presidential councils. Climate change is real. Leaving Paris is not good for America or the world.

Elon Musk (@ elonmusk)

Am departing presidential assemblies. Climate change is real. Leaving Paris is not good for America or the world.

June 1, 2017

Before that Ubers embattled CEO Travis Kalanick left Trumps business advisory council after the company faced analysi for working closely with the Trump administration and for its reply to the White Houses travel ban feigning parties from seven Muslim majority countries.

In January, the social media meme #DeleteUber exploded online after the ride-sharing firm was accused of manipulating the travel censor for commercial-grade income. In protest at the travel costs ban the New York Taxi Work Alliance announced on its members to avoid JFK airport. Nonetheless, Uber flouted the ten-strike although removed upsurge pricing from jaunts to and from international airports. It was far from Ubers most egregious projects, but enough to give arch contender Lyft a 7% lift in users.

Uber NYC (@ Uber_NYC)

Surge pricing has been turned off at #JFK Airport. This may result in longer wait times. Please be patient.

January 29, 2017

Uber defended for the misunderstanding and Kalanick sent a memo to all of Ubers staff.

There are many methods we will continue to preach for precisely change on migration, but standing on the council was going to get in the way of that, he answered.

Read more: https :// www.theguardian.com/ technology/ 2017/ jun/ 19/ donald-trump-american-tech-council-government-overhaul