Zenefits Parker Conrad returns with Rippling to kill HR & IT busywork

Parker Conrad likes to save occasion, even though it’s gotten him in bother. The former CEO of Zenefits was pushed out of the $4.5 billion human resources startup because he constructed a hacker that let him and employees get faster guarantee certifications. But 2.5 years later, he’s back to take the busy work out of staff onboarding as well as clumsy IT business like single sign-on to enterprise apps. Today his startup Rippling launches its blended hire administration structure, which Conrad calls a much larger endeavor than the minimum workable product it announced while in Y Combinator’s accelerator 18 months ago.

” It’s not an HR system. It’s a tier below that ,” Conrad tells me.” It’s this unholy, crazy mashup of three different things .” First, it handles payroll, advantages, taxation and PTO across all 50 states.” Except Syria and North Korea, you are able to spend anyone in the world with Rippling ,” Conrad allegations. That shapes it a opponent with Gusto … and Zenefits.

Second, it’s a substitution for Okta, Duo and other endeavor single-sign on insurance apps that show staffers across partnered apps. Gurgling bookmarklets make it easy to auth into over 250 workplace apps, like Gmail, Slack, Dropbox, Asana, Trello, AWS, Salesforce, GitHub and more. When an employee is hired or changes teams, a single modification to their role in Ruffling automatically changes all the permissions of what they can access.

And third, it handles computer endpoint defence like Jamf. When federal employees is hired, Rippling can instantaneously carry them a computer with all the right software installed and the hard drive encrypted, or have staffers include the Rippling agent that enforces the company’s defence criteria. The organisation is designed so there’s no need for an expert IT department to manage it.

” Distributed, fragmented systems of record for employee data are privately the sources of almost all the harassing administrative toil of running a company ,” Conrad clarifies.” If you could build this system that ties all of it together, you are able eliminate all this drivel task .” That’s Rippling. It’s opening up to all potential clients today, accusing them a combined subscription or a la carte costs for any of the three backstages of the product.

Conrad refused to say how much Rippling has raised total, citing the enhanced scrutiny Zenefits’ grows reap. But he says a Wall Street Journal report that Gurgling had raised$ 7 million was inaccurate.” We haven’t caused any priced VC rounds. Just a bunch of seed fund. We parent from Initialized Capital, almost all the early seed investors at Zenefits and a lot of individuals .” He cited Y Combinator, YC Growth Fund, YC’s founder Jessica Livingston and chairman Sam Altman, other YC partners, as well as DFJ and SV Angel.

” Because we were able to raise a cluster of coin and court great engineers . . . we were able to spend a great deal of time structure this fundamental technology ,” Conrad tells me. Rippling has about 50 team members now, with about 40 of them being architects, highlighting just how thoroughly Conrad wants to eradicate manual work about work, starting with his own startup.

The CEO refused to discuss details of exactly what went down at Zenefits and whether he conceived his ejection was fair. He was accused of allowing Zenefits’ insurance brokers to exchange in territories where they weren’t licensed, and returning some hires a macro that told them more quickly pass the online guarantee certification exam. Conrad aimed up about $534,000 in SEC penalties. Zenefits laid off 430 hires, or 45 percent of its personnel, and moved to selling software to small-to-medium sized enterprises through a network of insurance brokers.

But when asked what he’d “ve learned” Zenefits, Conrad seemed past those misfortunes and instead recalled that” one of the mistakes that we became was that we did a lot substance manually behind the scenes. When you scale up, there are these manual processes, and it’s really hard to come back eventually when it’s a big hard complicated concept and replace it with engineering. You get upside down on perimeters. If “youre starting” at the beginning and never let the manual handles creep in . . . it sort of drives .”

Perhaps it was trying to cut corners that got Conrad into the Zenefits mess, but now that same intention has inspired Rippling’s goal of eliminating HR and IT drudgery with an all-in-one tool.

” I believe I’m someone who feels the pain of that kind of trash particularly strongly. So that’s always been a real irritant to me, and I saw this problem. The conventional wisdom is’ don’t build something like this, begin with something much smaller ,'” Conrad deduces.” But I knew if I didn’t do this, that no one else was gong to do it and I actually required such systems to dwell. This is a company that’s all about pestering material and realise that fucking disturbing stuff go away .”

Read more: https :// techcrunch.com/ 2018/10/ 10/ ruffling /


How smartphone apps could help keep health records accurate

Suppose the next time you go to a new doctor’s office, you wouldn’t have to balance a clipboard on your knee, write down your whole medical history, remember the five-syllable name of every medication you’re taking and list all your allergies. Suppose that your smartphone could simply tap into the office’s computer system, where you could upload your entire medical history safely, securely and accurately.

Such an app could ease the frustration patients feel when they fill out the forms for a new doctor. More importantly, it could help solve a serious but lesser-known problem that plagues hospitals and clinics: While the increased use of electronic health records has helped streamline record-keeping, providers aren’t always able to reliably pull together records for the same patient that are held in different hospitals, clinics and doctor’s offices.

That was the scene in Boston in 2015, when emergency room doctors were struggling to treat a patient named Maureen Kelly — only to discover five different electronic records for Maureen Kelly, each with the same birthday and ZIP code. They had no way of knowing which record matched the patient in front of them. Was she the Maureen Kelly with diabetes? The Maureen Kelly who had only one kidney? And if they were to decide to send her record to a specialist outside the hospital, how could they know which of the five to send?

Fortunately, Maureen Kelly recovered. But to make the best possible medical decisions in cases like hers, doctors need immediate access to accurate patient data — including those from records held in other facilities. Digital systems should be able to seamlessly match records from a pediatrician in Pittsburgh or a surgeon in San Diego each and every time. An inability to do so — which could mean physicians not having important details, such as a patient’s drug allergies, chronic illnesses or past surgeries — can mean the difference between life and death.

Doctors using digital tablet together in hospital (Photo: Ariel Skelley/Getty Images)

It’s hard enough keeping records straight within a single large hospital system; transferring them among different doctors’ offices and other hospitals is even more challenging. As digital healthcare systems have proliferated, they’ve used a variety of formats to record essential pieces of information, such as addresses and birth dates, that don’t easily transfer from one system to another. And, of course, patients’ identifying information isn’t static — birth dates don’t change, but people move, change names through marriage or adoption, and more. Matches among different systems have also been stymied by data entry errors.

And while patient harm is the primary risk posed by inaccurate records, cost is no small consideration. The Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology reported that each instance of a misidentified record cost the Mayo Clinic roughly $1,200 — and that’s just within the Mayo system. These administrative costs are magnified when data are exchanged on a nationwide scale.

No one solution can solve every patient-matching problem. But The Pew Charitable Trusts is investigating several ideas. Pew recently asked the nonprofit RAND Corporation to evaluate solutions that would let patients exercise more control over how their records are matched. RAND looked at a variety of options and concluded that the growing use of smartphones offers a particularly promising opportunity to improve record matching in two ways.

Photo: Hero Images/Getty Images

First, smartphones could allow patients to verify their phone numbers at the point of care, perhaps by responding to a text message — a strategy already used in banking, travel, retail and other industries. Once a number was confirmed by the patient, the hospital’s computer could use it automatically to match other records against that number with a higher degree of certainty.

Second, patients could use an app to enter their information — such as an address or even a driver’s license number — and have that information sent directly to the hospital when they check in for their visit. This would let patients update their information and voluntarily provide more accurate data to facilitate a match. Smartphone apps could eventually aggregate and transfer even more information — such as medication lists or health histories — and replace the paper on clipboards used today.

The smartphone approach will not solve this problem by itself. There are potential limitations — patients would need to own phones and know how to use them, and the system might not work in emergency situations when a patient didn’t have or couldn’t operate a smartphone — but the Pew Research Center found earlier this year that more than three-quarters of Americans now use smartphones, including nearly half of people older than 65.

To address the larger problem of patient matching, stakeholders must pursue a variety of solutions, including smartphone apps. Technology developers would be wise to advance and start pilot projects now of smartphones and a variety of other solutions, and demonstrate how they could be used to save lives, improve care and reduce healthcare costs.

Read more: https://techcrunch.com/2018/10/03/the-doctor-is-in-your-app/

It’s Amazon’s world. We just live in it.

Amazon.com isn’t America’s biggest corporation. By market detonator, it trails Apple. Calibrated by number of hires, it’s behind Walmart. By revenues, it’s a distant eighth on the Fortune 500list. But measured by usefulnes to modern living and ability to determined the American economy in its own epitome, Amazon is second to nothing.

It has a full suite of electronic inventions, including a digital deputy that thousands of consumers rely on to perform daily tasks( Alexa ), an electronic reader( Kindle) and a residence security system( Echoing ). Its server business hosts a third of the world’s cloud-based data. After deflating brick-and-mortar retail, it’s become a brick-and-mortar retailer itself with its $13.7 billion buy of Whole Foods, its physical bookstores, and its foray into cashierless convenience store. Now, it’s trying to become the place where you can find a handyman and crowd your prescriptions, maybe even buy home insurance and get a loan.

All of that emergence has helped constitute the man behind Amazon, CEO and founder Jeff Bezos, the world’s richest being, with a net worth of $160.2 billion, according to Forbes — although that goes up or down with the company’s capital price each day.

Welcome to the United States of Amazon.

In the upcoming weeks, CNN Business will examine the many courses Amazon has penetrated the American economy — from potential benefits it brings to the risks its immense affect poses.

Amazon is expending AI in almost everything it does

KZen raises $4 million to bring sanity to crypto wallets

KZen, a company run by former TC editor Ouriel Ohayon, has raised $4 million in seed to build a “better wallet,” obviously the elusive Holy Grail in the crypto world.

Benson Oak Ventures, Samsung Next, Elron Ventures invested.

Ohayon, who has worked at Internet Lab and founded TechCrunch France and Appsfire, wanted to create an easy-to-use crypto wallet that wouldn’t confound users. The company name is a play on the Japanese word kaizen or improvement and it also points to the idea of the zero-knowledge proof.

Omer Shlomovits, Tal Be’ery, and Gary Benattar are deep crypto researchers and developers and helped build the wallet of Ohayon’s dreams.

“We wanted something that did not feel like a pre-AOL experience, that was incredibly superior in terms of security, and simple to use,” he said. “We wanted a solution that brings peace of mind and that did not force the user into compromising between convenience and security which is, unfortunately, the current state of affairs. We quickly realized that this mission would not be possible to achieve with the same tools and ideas other companies tried to use so far.”

The app is launching this month and is being kept under wraps until then. Ohayon is well aware that the world doesn’t need another crypto wallet but he’s convinced his solution is the best one.

“The market does not lack solutions,” he said. “On the contrary, there are software wallets, hardware wallets, paper wallets, vaults, hosted custody. But there is no great solution. To be able to use a crypto wallet you either need a good dose of Xanax or a master’s degree in computer science or both, unless you want to depend on a central entity, which is even worse as the news are reminding us weekly.”

We’ll see as they use the cash to launch a crypto wallet that anyone – not just Xanax-eaters – can use.

Read more: https://techcrunch.com/2018/10/03/kzen-raises-4-million-to-bring-sanity-to-crypto-wallets/

Trumps family separations: watchdog review paints damning picture of policy

Report says 2,600 children were separated from their parents without adequate organisations in place to track or reunite families

Donald Trump’s administration distinguished more than 2,600 children from their parents without adequate organisations in place to track or reunite families, according to the first government review of the contentious family break policy.

The Department of Homeland Security( DHS) struggled to monitor and reunite households and plied parents sweeping the border with incompatible intelligence while enforcing the” zero indulgence” policy that attained clas break-up possible, according to the report released on Tuesday by the DHS office of inspector general( OIG ).

The report covered a damning picture of different agencies unable to adequately cooperate or share data and a organisation that was so full of inconsistencies and openings that information on vulnerable children or their parents is likely to be travel missing or not be collected.

” DHS was not fully prepared to implement the administration’s zero accept program or to deal with some of its after-effects ,” the 25 -page report said .

Using information collected on unannounced his trip to DHS facilities in Texas in belatedly June- almost a week after Trump signed an manager order aiming their own families estrangement programme– the OIG learnt 😛 TAGEND

The main departments involved with pedigree estrangement, DHS and the health department, did not have adequate information sharing plans. The OIG said it could find no prove to subscribe a statement made by the two departments in late June that there was ” a center database” with information on marked families.

Parents were given inconsistent information and some did not understand their children would be separated from them. One parent said a border patrol agent told him he would be reunited with his 5-year-old daughter after are to be found in court, but when he got to courtroom, he was given a flyer explaining he was segregated from his child.

Efforts to ensure the youngest children were adequately tracked and related were insufficient.” Border patrol does not afford pre-verbal children with wrist bangles or other ways and means of identification , nor does border patrol fingerprint or photograph most children during processing is so that they can be easily linked with the proper file ,” the report said.

IRS can do more to protect against tax fraudsters, watchdog says

A government watchdog has said that the Internal Revenue Service could do more to impede tax fraud if it vested more coin in making sure that the identities of taxpayers are properly verified.

From the IRS’s own data, fraudsters scammed the agency out of at least $1.6 billion in excise pays during the 2016 excise season that belonged to taxpayers. That’s a drop in the ocean to the $383 billion paid out in lawful tax returns. But the new report by the Government Accountability Office said that the IRS still has a way to go to prevent further fraudulent activity.

” While IRS regularly assesses jeopardies to and monitors its online authentication applications, it has not launched evenly thorough internal limits for its telephone, in-person, and mail canals, including devices to collect reliable, relevant data to monitor authentication outcomes ,” said the report.” As a develop, IRS may not recognize current or developing threats to the tax system .”

In other statements, the IRS can’t always guarantee that it’s you calling up about your charge things or logging in to the website.

That’s a problem because around levy season, scammers obtain tax returns or filings — through reveals or breaches — and use that information to masquerade taxpayers. By filing bogus tax returns before the legitimate taxpayer does, the scammer can collect the fraudulently secured return.

These breaches aren’t helping troubles, said IRS premier datum detective Gina Garza at a House committee hearing on Thursday. Certainly, the IRS had to clean up after its own data infraction last year, in which 100,000 taxpayers had their taxation information stolen — just two years after a separate IRS infringement affected 300,000 taxpayers.

Although the government watchdog said that the IRS has made some steps to improve its taxpayer verification efforts, relevant agencies” does not have clear schedules and timelines” to implement guidance provided by the National Institute of Standards and Technology that would properly authenticate taxpayers.

One of the relevant recommendations was to notify taxpayers when a tax return had been filed in their reputation, which would help get ahead of scammers trying to cash in on fraudulent returns. But the guardian said that the IRS hasn’t met the funding to roll out notifications.

Some of such measures could still take between six months and three years to accomplish, such reports said, leaving millions of taxpayers to defend themselves against the ongoing the risk of being tax fraud.

The IRS admitted all of GAO’s 11 recommendations. IRS spokesperson Cecilia Barreda declined to comment further.

Read more: https :// techcrunch.com/ 2018/09/ 27/ irs-can-do-more-to-protect-against-tax-fraudsters-watchdog-says /

FCC cracks the whip on 5G deployment against protests of local governments

The FCC is pushing for speedy deployment of 5G networks nationwide with an order adopted today that streamlines what it perceives as a patchwork of obstacles, needless costs and contradictory regulations at the state level. But local governments say the federal agency is taking things too far.

5G networks will consist of thousands of wireless installations, smaller and more numerous than cell towers. This means that wireless companies can’t use existing facilities, for all of it at least, and will have to apply for access to lots of new buildings, utility poles and so on. It’s a lot of red tape, which of course impedes deployment.

To address this, the agency this morning voted 3 to 1 along party lines to adopt the order (PDF) entitled “Accelerating Wireline Broadband Deployment by Removing Barriers to Infrastructure Investment.” What it essentially does is exert FCC authority over state wireless regulators and subject them to a set of new rules superseding their own.

First the order aims to literally speed up deployment by standardizing new, shorter “shot clocks” for local governments to respond to applications. They’ll have 90 days for new locations and 60 days for existing ones — consistent with many existing municipal time frames but now to be enforced as a wider standard. This could be good, as the longer time limits were designed for consideration of larger, more expensive equipment.

The 5G wireless revolution will come, if your city council doesn’t block it first


On the other hand, some cities argue, it’s just not enough time — especially considering the increased volume they’ll be expected to process.

Cathy Murillo, mayor of Santa Barbara, writes in a submitted comment:

The proposed ‘shot clocks’ would unfairly and unreasonably reduce the time needed for proper application review in regard to safety, aesthetics, and other considerations. By cutting short the necessary review period, the proposals effectively shift oversight authority from the community and our elected officials to for-profit corporations for wireless equipment installations that can have significant health, safety, and aesthetic impacts when those companies have little, if any, interest to respect these concerns.

Next, and even less popular, is the FCC’s take on fees for applications and right-of-way paperwork. These fees currently vary widely, because as you might guess it is far more complicated and expensive — often by an order of magnitude or more — to approve and process an application for (not to mention install and maintain) an antenna on 5th Avenue in Manhattan than it is in outer Queens. These are, to a certain extent anyway, natural cost differences.

The order limits these fees to “a reasonable approximation of their costs for processing,” which the FCC estimated at about $500 for one application for up to five installations or facilities, $100 for additional facilities, and $270 per facility per year, all-inclusive.

For some places, to be sure, that may be perfectly reasonable. But as Catherine Pugh, mayor of Baltimore, put it in a letter (PDF) to the FCC protesting the proposed rules, it sure isn’t for her city:

An annual fee of $270 per attachment, as established in the above document, is unconscionable when the facility may yield profits, in some cases, many times that much in a given month. The public has invested and installed these assets [i.e. utility poles and other public infrastructure], not the industry. The industry does not own these assets; the public does. Under these circumstances, it is entirely reasonable that the public should be able to charge what it believes to be a fair price.

There’s no doubt that excessive fees can curtail deployment and it would be praiseworthy of the FCC to tackle that. But the governments they are hemming in don’t seem to appreciate being told what is reasonable and what isn’t.

“It comes down to this: three unelected officials on this dais are telling state and local leaders all across the country what they can and cannot do in their own backyards,” said FCC Commissioner Jessica Rosenworcel in a statement presented at the vote. “This is extraordinary federal overreach.”

It’s time to chart a course for 5G success


New York City’s commissioner of information technology told Bloomberg that his office is “shocked” by the order, calling it “an unnecessary and unauthorized gift to the telecommunications industry and its lobbyists.”

The new rules may undermine deployment deals that already exist or are under development. After all, if you were a wireless company, would you still commit to paying $2,000 per facility when the feds just gave you a coupon for 80 percent off? And if you were a city looking at a budget shortfall of millions because of this, wouldn’t you look for a way around it?

Chairman Ajit Pai argued in a statement that “When you raise the cost of deploying wireless infrastructure, it is those who live in areas where the investment case is the most marginal—rural areas or lower-income urban areas—who are most at risk of losing out.”

But the basic market economics of this don’t seem to work out. Big cities cost more and are more profitable; rural areas cost less and are less profitable. Under the new rules, big cities and rural areas will cost the same, but the former will be even more profitable. Where would you focus your investments?

The FCC also unwisely attempts to take on the aesthetic considerations of installations. Cities have their own requirements for wireless infrastructure, such as how it’s painted, where it can be located and what size it can be when in this or that location. But the FCC seems (as it does so often these days) to want to accommodate the needs of wireless providers rather than the public.

Wireless companies complain that the rules are overly restrictive or subjective, and differ too greatly from one place to another. Municipalities contend that the restrictions are justified and, at any rate, their prerogative to design and enforce.

“Given these differing perspectives and the significant impact of aesthetic requirements on the ability to deploy infrastructure and provide service, we provide guidance on whether and in what circumstances aesthetic requirements violate the [Communications] Act,” the FCC’s order reads. In other words, wireless industry gripes about having to paint their antennas or not hang giant microwave arrays in parks are being federally codified.

“We conclude that aesthetics requirements are not preempted if they are (1) reasonable, (2) no more burdensome than those applied to other types of infrastructure deployments, and (3) published in advance,” the order continues. Does that sound kind of vague to you? Whether a city’s aesthetic requirement is “reasonable” is hardly the jurisdiction of a communications regulator.

For instance, Hudson, Ohio city manager Jane Howington writes in a comment on the order that the city has 40-foot limits on pole heights, to which the industry has already agreed, but which would be increased to 50 under the revisions proposed in the rule. Why should a federal authority be involved in something so clearly under local jurisdiction and expertise?

Ultra-fast 5G wireless service declared national security priority by White House


This isn’t just an annoyance. As with the net neutrality ruling, legal threats from states can present serious delays and costs.

“Every major state and municipal organization has expressed concern about how Washington is seeking to assert national control over local infrastructure choices and stripping local elected officials and the citizens they represent of a voice in the process,” said Rosenworcel. “I do not believe the law permits Washington to run roughshod over state and local authority like this and I worry the litigation that follows will only slow our 5G future.”

She also points out that the predicted cost savings of $2 billion — by telecoms, not the public — may be theorized to spur further wireless deployment, but there is no requirement for companies to use it for that, and in fact no company has said it will.

In other words, there’s every reason to believe that this order will sow discord among state and federal regulators, letting wireless companies save money and sticking cities with the bill. There’s certainly a need to harmonize regulations and incentivize wireless investment (especially outside city centers), but this doesn’t appear to be the way to go about it.

Read more: https://techcrunch.com/2018/09/26/fcc-cracks-the-whip-on-5g-deployment-against-protests-of-local-governments/