The air traffic control tower of the future could be miles away from the airport

Would you rely a remote air traffic controller to territory your flight ?
Image: High Level/ REX/ Shutterstock

It’s such a creepy happen to discover, it seems counter-intuitive: London City Airport is constructing a brand-new air traffic control tower that will be completely digital and manned by a group of human controllers who will be over 100 miles away.

High-definition video will be transmitted to the remote location, providing the human controllers with 360 -degree video and live clang so that the controllers will feel like they’re still at the airport even though they’re far away.

The big advantage here: the high-definition visuals, provided by over a dozen different “pan-tilt-zoom” cameras, will enable controllers to look situations in finer items than we are able to with the naked attention with a 30 X zoom, like discerning rogue monotones that pose a danger.

Nats Air Traffic Control( NATS ), which is helping with these systems, outlined other great advantage the system will bring, like data provided via augmented world video.

They will also have real-time information, including operational and sensory data, to build an augmented world live scene of the airfield. For illustration, the ability to overlay the images with weather datum, on-screen descriptions, radar data, aircraft label signalings, or to track moving objects.

It’ll be the first UK airport to use the technology, though the system has been in use at a pair of airports in Sweden.

Steve Anderson, of NATS, told the BBC, “They give the controller more information in terms of what they can see, what they can hear.”

But there are still reasons for skepticism, mostly over the digital security of the system which will extradite all of those videos and other related information, particularly in view of last week’s massive ransomware attack.

Declan Collier, London City Airport chief executive, told the BBC, “we are very confident that the systems we’re putting in place here are secure, they’re safe, they’re oversaw very well.” An airport spokesperson also told NBC News that the system has been “stress-tested by IT security experts” and the company in charge is developed “to guard against the latest threats.”

But no communication is completely safe.

Jason Sabin, Chief Security Officer of security mixtures firm DigiCert, developed on some of the biggest threats to a method like this in a discussion with Mashable .

“The number one threat would be default configuration. They purchase the camera from the manufacturer, they attract it out of the box, determined it up and plug it in and say they’re ready to go.”

The jeopardies here, according to Sabin, include having default passwords and no encryption that make such internet of things( IoT) designs susceptible to attack, such as the September 2016 Mirai botnet administered denial of services that are onslaughts( DDoS) on Krebs Security.

Mirai became even more well-known in October 2016 when it was used in the large-scale attack on domain name servers host Dyn, which led to the shut down of major websites like Twitter, Spotify and Paypal.

Encryption and authentication are likewise keys, replies Sabin. “Encryption is very important but authentication is just as important because you want to make sure you’re corrected to the right party and that the right person is connected” to the device.

“If you’re the air traffic controller who’s supposed to have to access to this, they are going to be authenticating to the cameras and the cameras need to make sure that it is the air traffic controller and not a malevolent consumer who’s trying to gain access to the camera network.”

Mashable has reached out to NATS for more info on security rights they plan to implement in the new system.

Read more: